May 2012 challenge: “Mad Science”
m. a. d. - How not to fail at pyweek and then fail at pyweek
Posted by Ernie on 2012/06/08 18:46
Pro and Cons in the feedback:
Some people didn't understand the idea.
There is a pyglet-windows bug in context of setting icons.
I should mention which version of pyglet and python i use.
The logo got someone to really want to play it.
The self drawn pixel font and the graphics are "hot".
The game is bizarre and somewhat amusing.
It cannot be called a game.
I confused some people.
It is more art than a game.
So in a summary: There are only pros! ;)
Apart from that i have to apologize to everyone who expected fun.
I found that python isn't my favorite programming language anymore :( In contrast to haskell it isn't as elegant and beautiful as before. Although it's still one of my favourites.
Hopefully i will finish a game next time!
A Pythontastic Journey - Thank you
Posted by ozroc on 2012/06/01 17:10
Hope next time will have more time to give you a real game.
Consider this as a proof of concept.
Dr. Chemical's Lab - Postmortem - Doctor Chemical's Lab
Posted by superjoe on 2012/05/29 02:35
Video of me playing survival mode for 4 minutes.
Things that went well
- Squish and I worked well together. I handled all the programming and game mechanics and she provided art and animations in exactly the format I requested it in. Very little time was lost in overhead costs.
Things that went poorly
- Had lots of trouble getting the game to work on OS X.
- People can't be bothered to find a buddy to play with - if you want a top score in PyWeek, don't bother with multiplayer. Check out the video linked above to see what multiplayer mode looks like.
- The gameplay is rather complex, and the game does not help the player learn to play gradually, but instead, drops the player into a difficult arena, totally unprepared for what is happening.
- Squish put incorrect instructions in the "How to Play" screen, and I didn't catch it until way too late. However, as BlueDragon pointed out, even the real instructions are confusing.
- Atoms fall down too quickly - the speed at which they fall should start out very slow and then slowly increase.
- The crazy physics glitch bugs that remained are bad enough and occur frequently enough to almost render the game unplayable.
- No score in survival mode.
- Bombs are actually helpful, not hurtful.
- I'm considering creating a new game just to explore the grapple gun concept. I think that there is some complex and ridiculously fun gameplay to be had there.
The Cicada Of Antarctica - Apology for Pheega
Posted by circusblatta on 2012/05/27 20:12
This morning i was surprising for the bad rating and one comment.
I don't know why we recived so low rating, compared to “pluto the ninth planet” and “camouflage” the game is more complete, but clearly we made some mistakes.
The comment is:
“... I really object to the sexual
objectification of the female
lead, starting with the picture of her bum in the intro sequence. It felt gratuitous and
exploitative, and definitely not cool.”
The opening comic is a comic and in the comics there are often sexual references. I created Pheega with the help of Milo Manara comics, these comics are full of sexual picture but I don't belive he depicts the women like objects, the female character of Milo Manara are always strong and indipendent, like Pheega. Besides I like the female body and I enjoyed drawing this scene. If you consider this picture exploitative you must consider the cute animals, cultural references and more exploitative too: they are all potential way of win the others over. In any case we do the games because we like doing them and because the peole appreciate them. If someone appreciates the butt of pheega my purpose is reached.
If I like drawing in this way I will not censor myself for possible misunderstanding due to wrong point of view.
“Only the self-censorship is worse then the censorship” Andrea Pazienza (1956-1988).
Sorry for my english.
Dr Korovic's Flying Atomic Squid - Doctor Korovic's Flying Atomic Squid - Winner's Edition
Posted by mauve on 2012/05/27 17:31
Thanks to everyone who played and rated my game.
How I Took Over the World - How I Took Over the World: Postmortem
Posted by Tee on 2012/05/27 16:14
1. I haven't really followed other posts. Part of the fun of Pyweek is to see how other people are doing and comment on their work. I barely had time to work on my game, so didn't have a lot of time to do that either. (In the past I would procrastinate my Pyweek game to see what others are doing. I should start doing that again. :))
2. I was hoping I could play the games and write comments about them, but suddenly unexpected priorities appeared and I ended up not playing them at all (at least they didn't happen during Pyweek). I will when I have some more time, but not being able to rate them made me really frustrated this Pyweek. I know I haven't done that either in the previous one, but I don't want this to become a trend. Unfortunately, life is busy and this is hard to avoid.
3. I think I got too used to Pyweek. I felt that I needed to complete my game just for the sake of completing. I'm not sure why, but in this Pyweek I lacked the drive and inspiration I had in previous Pyweeks. At some point all I wanted was to just get over with it. I think that might have shown that a little in my game: in most of my games there is some part of it that's a little experimental, a piece of my personality, even if people don't notice. I guess a side-view TD where you build rooms and carry turrets around is a little different (I have played side-view TDs -- Plants vs Zombies being a famous example -- but not where you build rooms and carry turrets, and I think that changes the dynamics of the game). However, for some reason I can't quite explain, I wasn't very excited about it. I guess I could say that the experimentality of this game is more on the surface rather than ingrained in the core.
My goal next Pyweek is to find a way to regain this drive. I'll try to remember to do something more experimental, even if it doesn't work so well. I also intend to reduce my scope to make something completely finished. Sending something unfinished is unfortunately starting to become a routine and I should consider that as good as a DNF for me.
Still, I'm glad that some people enjoyed my game. However, for the reasons I mentioned above, I don't intend to continue working on this game even if I had time. (I would rather finish my previous game paeranoia, for example, but I don't think I have time for that either.)
Anyway, about the game itself. As I wrote in another post, my original plan was more ambitious than what I submitted.
I wanted to make a Death Ray simulator. The idea was that you would go from planet to planet to threaten and destroy them. I had this idea to make an X-COM-like game in the sense that it's a double genre game (sim and tbs). I wanted to make a sim and defense game in a similar vein: you would have the sim part where you would travel to different planets and use resources to upgrade your ship, and you would have a defense part during the ray charging which would be a more developed version of what I submitted, and there would be interactions between both parts.
Obviously, I didn't have time to do all that. I guess I knew that from the beginning, but part of me was hoping I would be able to make both parts superficially. When I realized that wasn't possible, I decided to stick with the defense part, since it was more playable and I had already drawn that part.
However, as I explained before, I feel like it lacked a little personality from me. Although this game had more work put on than many of my previously submitted games, it ended up unfinished and I definitely don't feel as satisfied as I felt in my previous Pyweeks. I have been doing Pyweeks for a long time, so I guess a feeling of routine is natural, but I would really like regain that sense of satisfaction and completeness next time. Maybe then I will produce something people really enjoy.
On the plus side, I think some of the graphics turned out nice -- particularly the death ray and the research lab animation (for the work of someone inexperienced in art, of course). I also think I'm getting better at execution.
Well, feel free to comment. If any of the Pyweek veterans out there had the same feeling of routine, or if you have any interesting opinion about any of this, I'd definitely like to hear from you.
Thanks to Richard for hosting this Pyweek and to those who made an effort to write verbose comments. Congratulations to the winners! See you all next Pyweek (hopefully more excited and better inspired :))!
Mad Atoms - Postmortem
Posted by petraszd on 2012/05/27 12:27
Realization that I am at third place was best ego reducing therapy in last year, I think...
And third place is wonderful too. I remember playing "Mechanism" or "The FInal Huzzah" and thinking: "damn -- my game sucks...".
Things I have learned:
- I not am a god of python...
- Art is important
- The only things I can paint are simple geometric figures
- Music is important
- Do not fear to erase all progress and start over (Dinosaurs and Santa Clauses...)
- It is sad but it is safer (less DNW) to make game with pygame than with pyglet
- pyglet is still awesome
- I have trick you (players) with best scores to think my game is better than it is...
I need to go mobile for sure. Controls are perfect for touch screen. I need to port this game to android and maybe HTML5. I have no mac or idevice -- so no iOS port.
Grey Goo - Postmortem
Posted by Mat on 2012/05/27 10:53
The fun score (3.6) was my best so far I think.
One of the criticisms I got was
"Needed less punishing death and more rewards for the player in progressing upward."
which is fair. I thought about having checkpoints but thought that it wouldn't work for such a simple game. If I were to expand it I think I would need to add additional gameplay elements (e.g. enemies) so it doesn't get too repetitive.
After a disastrous start, I managed my time pretty well and came up with a plan that was actually achievable. I had plenty of time left for testing, packaging etc. this time round.
I used sfxr for the first time for sound effects, which is awesome http://drpetter.se/project_sfxr.html
My hacky method of generating the map actually worked! Making it actually possible to win is tricky :/
It wasn't particularly innovative. I need to come up with some more interesting ideas next time.
I think a slower pace and more mazelike levels would have been better, but I just didn't have the time.
I didn't use the full 7 days, so the game is very simple and short. I think next time I might set aside more time and maybe do a team entry?
Cloud Shepard: http://www.pyweek.org/e/cloud-shepherd/
Multiverse Factory 14: http://www.pyweek.org/e/multifac14/
See you next pyweek :)
all_your_base - Postmortem
Posted by bitcraft on 2012/05/27 07:11
I am so happy with how my entry did. Much better than my previous entries!
Things done right:
Set goals on each day
Use revision control (github)
Develop artwork (tileset)
Use existing resources well (hero sprite, music)
Good performance on many machines
Things not so right:
Not fix annoying bugs (no time!)
Not being clear about the requirements (python 2.7)
I'm going to address a comment posted about my game because I felt it was too critical of the entry and justify myself here. The comment, verbatim:
Dying is fun — unless it's the lousy platforming implementation that kills you. For example
getting stuck in a door and getting shot or running into an infinite loop in movePosition().
It's hard to score the art. It shows that it is lifted from various places because it does not
have a uniform style and is not put into the game neatly (try jumping while running for
Platforming: yes, there are bugs. on python 3.2 especially, the timing is totally off (not my fault) and makes the bugs worse. for one person making a platforming game in less than one week is no easy task. also, getting shot is part of the game, not a bug.
art: are you kidding me? i created the tiles from another tileset (had to redraw them all completely), made the robot myself and had to customize the animations for the hero. the art totally has a style, i'm sorry if you don't see it. the platforming sprite was not from me, but was very well animated and took a lot of work to get the details right. there was no jumping animation with the sprite, why be so critical if the running animation plays while running?
the innovation score of one is totally uncalled for. i should have gotten much higher than that. the game combined a platforming game, a puzzle game, and elements of rougelikes with the text, collecting keys, and unforgiving death. get a clue, seriously.
Fun with Color Streams - Note to self, check package contents before uploading
Posted by bjorn on 2012/05/25 06:40
if you want to try them you can get them from github:
or grab the whole tarball: