Lets disqualify Updown World
The entry violates rule 2. Entries are to be written "from scratch"
The code looks similar to https://github.com/sourabhv/FlapPyBird/blob/master/flappy.py
FlapPyBird is not a library that can be used. FlapPyBird is not a documentation that can be copy-pasted.
Look like the entry violates The MIT License from github.com/sourabhv/FlapPyBird but I'm not sure.
(log in to comment)
Comments
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
People can make their own decisions on whether to vote to disqualify.
We seriously need a redesign of the rating system and more swift actions from the community to disqualify violating entries.
Sadly I think the creator of updown got in expecting an experience similar to scratch, got confused, went to stackoverflow (and got closed), and eventually became desprate thinking he had to turn in an entry. So he took flaPyBird and replaced every part of it and hastily tried to make it connect, and proceeded to fail miserably. Which is kinda sad honestly.
xmzhang1 on 2018/05/01 09:39:
Aha, the flappybird is not hard to code in my opinion, if the author just copy and paste, that would no help for improving his skills. Maybe the author just like the game, did not carefully read the rules, or even do not know the MIT license (I do not know the differences among these licenses either, only cc0 can be copy and paste? ). However, for pyweek, just for fun, be happy, do not be serious. :)