Is multi-player...

RB[0] on 2007/04/01 00:15 of Team Quicksilver

...worth the effort to you guys??

We were planning it, but it appears that multi-player games havent faired so well in the past, and if no-one really cares, then we'll save ourselves the trouble I think...

By multi-player I mean network, not same computer, multi-player.

So what is your preference,
A: multi-player
B: single-player
C: dont really care

(log in to comment)

Comments

richard on 2007/04/01 00:17:

If you do MP then you have to have a lobby so we can meet up to test it together.

RB[0] on 2007/04/01 00:19:

yeah, I know, yet another thing to worry about :/

I figure if we go multi-player it will probably cost us about 1-3 days in the end...

saluk on 2007/04/01 05:36:

If MP doesn't cost you the game, it's worth it, otherwise, it aint :)

john on 2007/04/01 08:06:

MP would be a right pain, I mean what if you were the only person using it, what if your internet goes dead? Personally I would stay with SP.

tsmaster on 2007/04/01 09:05:

Regardless of what kind of multiplayer (networked, PBEM, splitscreen, hotseat) you implement, Richard's got a point - if you don't make it super simple to find other multiplayer players, people will only play single player when judging your game.